Sunday, March 1, 2020

INDIA and MUSLIMS


                                                          India  and Muslims

                           Muslim canon law--------Dar-ul-Islam [Abode of Islam]
                                                                        Dar-Ul-Harb [abode of war]

By this doctrine India can belong to Muslims only when they rule it. India ceases to be land of Muslims when not rulers.
     Then a pertinent question comes----Is this doctrine compatible with Indian democracy and Secularism we preach?
                      Answer  is -----NO.
With this political set of mind of Muslims, how should we handle Secularism and democracy? One needs to read book of B R Ambedkar---“Pakistan or partition of India” on this issue. Muslims have already divided this country in to three and a section of them want further division of this country. Take statement of Imam, asking Muslims to block road in ASSAM to cut North East from INDIA. Analyze statements of Muslim leaders like Waris , OWAISI AND OTHERS WHO OPENLY challenge GOI.  A agitation has been started in country on nonexistent NRC. There is willful twisting of CAA , NPR and Muslims are told to agitate against union of India for its antimuslim law. People are told CAA will deprive them of citizenship which is a fabricated Lie. CAA grants citizenship, does not take away citizenship. Whole idea of agitation is to polarize and divide India again. There are Muslim leaders who say we are descendants of Timur , Babar , Ghazni . By this they are telling masses that we were rulers and we should rule again.  In this effort they are helped by clergy too. Darul-uloom-Deoband has called Modi anti muslim and has told Muslims in India to oppose GOI  tooth and nail.
                     Behavior of Muslims in India has been irrational in past and continues till now. Instead of voluntarily surrendering land for RAM temple at AYODHYA  they made a issue out of it.  Relocation of mosque should have been no issue as mosque is not basic tenant of Islam. Ayodhya temple is one of the pillars of Hinduism, and Muslims ignored Hindu sentiments on this. They want us to be sensitive on religious issues but themselves are not sensitive on other religions beliefs. So many mosques have been built over temple sites and Muslims are proud of this heritage. Muslims make issue of Beef in India. There is no mention of beef in AL Quran. Beef is one of the tenants of Hinduism, yet they ignore it.  This is pure arrogance and Dadagiri.This is happening because we Hindus are too tolerant. No Muslim scholar/ politician is admonishing them for their behavior. There is a big Irony,  some  muslim intellectuals are telling that Hindus are becoming intolerant. Just because you dislike BJP , you have no right to destroy country. This behavior is not acceptable.
                         The amount of freedom Indian Muslim enjoys is unparalled in whole world. They don’t have that much freedom even in Muslim countries. Yet they talk about human right violation. Their leaders are dead silent on ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri pundits in valley but talk of internet facilities in valley. They are dead silent on how minorities are treated in Pakistan and Bangla Desh but talk on settling Rohingya in India. How would you label this mentality of Muslims of India?
   Pakistan founder Jinnah said, “Aurangzeb presided over a conquest state where Hindus had to submit to his rule unwillingly”. Muslims of India do not acknowledge it  as they don’t want to be projected as bad people in country.
While in Islam   religion and politics are inseparable, in India we have separated two for better governance. Aurangzeb in 1669AD issued order to destroy all temples in India which included Kashivishvanath temple in Varanasi , Somnath temple in Gujarat. Tons of literature including Holy Scriptures were burnt. Yet Muslims call him devote and pious Muslim. Mohd Bin Qasim decapitated all Brahmins above the age of 17 years. Ghazni looted and destroyed Somnath temple. Mass killings by Timur, Babar ,Aurangzeb  , even Akbar are documented by Muslim historians of the day . Yet Muslims in India tell us Islam believes in brotherhood and respect for other religions.
   As a society we should be ashamed to blindly believe that Sufi’s were proponents of humanity and tolerance. Infact many Sufi’s presided over demolition of temples and built mosques at temple site. Some of the Sufi edicts were as follows:--
       Hindus should bow physically to muslim.
        Hindu to dress deplorably, have distinct dress.
        Hindu cannot ride horse and use jewelry.
        Hindu cannot wear turban.”

THOUSAND OF HINDUS VISIT MUSLIM SHRINES LITTLE KNOWING THAT THESE HOLY MEN WORKED IN TANDEM  with Muslim rulers to impose Islam in India. India gave refuge to Prophet’s family who were fleeing their country, chief among them was Caliph  Ali ‘s daughter Ruqaya. They were given shelter by Lahore king Raja Anandpal. Ironically no Muslim shielded Anandpal when Muslim invaders raided India. This is height of ingratitude. Arrogance of Muslims  has not ended even after partitioning India.
     With above brief historical review and mind set of Indian Muslim, it is hard to believe they believe in peace. For them India is Dar-ul-Harb [Abode of war]. Instead of being grateful for freedom they enjoy in this country they are bent upon to split it further. Muslims of India owe a apology to Hindus for all what they have done to us and country.
     Dadagiri of Muslim clergy needs to be stopped. Madrassas need to teach history of ancient India and fundamentalism in their teachings needs to be stopped. Muslims of India need to own this country and help in building and strengthening democracy and secularism. Muslims need to change Muslim canon law. They should talk in terms of democracy and respect for other religions.
  Lastly, Muslims of India should accept that they are Hindu converts. If they continue to harp on foreign origin then we have every right to treat them as invaders. Muslims of India have to decide—“”-Indian  natives or foreigner”.