Saturday, May 31, 2025

Varna / Caste System In India

The caste system is being used as weapon against Hindus. It is being labelled as cause of backwardness of India. In reality it is this diverse Hindu society which created a mighty civilization thousands of years back and is continuing till date despite onslaught on it by foreign rulers who ruled India for near thousand years. This civilization has outlasted all other civilization on this planet. This civilization called Vedic civilization gave science and Math to this world. Other civilizations on Earth believed in too much present that they have become past This Vedic civilization believed in future hence continuing .India was most prosperous state till foreigners conquered it and destroyed it.

It is important to understand importance of Varna/ caste system in ancient India. In order to integrate the various diverse groups into one ecosystem so that communities could trade, communicate and resist central authority Varna system was adopted. In this system there was division of labour with preservation of natural diversity in the individual. This is even seen today when we see diversity in rituals, deities, food habits and language , yet we all belong to Hindu society. Society was divided into four groups [ Varnas]. These four groups were---Brahmins, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra. Brahmin was to guide and teach society including rituals , Kshatriya was to rule and defend , Vaishya to deal in trade and Shudra to do petty day to day works including menial work. Division of labour was done according to capability of individual and was not birth based. Dharamshastras forbade Brahmin to enmass wealth. Brahmins had no organization to dictate. Varna-Ashram system ensured that no one was exploited so telling Brahmins made life of Shudra miserable is far from truth. Magesthenes , Greek traveler states in his book that there was no slavery in India. This is the period when Maurya’s were rulers. Infact he calls shudras , Sodrai’ , an important community in society. This is contrary to western writers who tell us Shudras and Dalits have been enslaved since Vedic times in India.

Hinduism is not canonical , not defined by Dharamshastras so telling taboos ,restrictions , untouchability are sanctified by core Hindu texts is absurd. Word caste does not exist in Sanskrit. This word was coined by Portuguese when they came to India. They saw Indian community organized into various occupational”Jatis”. They called them casta which was turned into caste system by British. West in order to legitimize their rule started denigrating Indian civilization. They demonized Sanskrit language and blamed Indian social order for backwardness /poverty of India. They came up with theories like “wokeism” and critical race theory [CRT] to prove their superiority and blamed caste system for enslaving Shudras and Dalits while it has been proved by historians , travelers that there were no slaves in India. Day in and out west is playing this Shudra card to denigrate India’s social order and culture.

Vedic civilization on contrary is diverse with mutual respect and reducing consumption. Western civilization in contrast is violent , destructive and consumption based. In west diversity is in name only.It is egoistic and there is endless expanse of desires in it. Vedic culture of nature ,is a being with its own rights but west says nature is its property. West has been harping on hierarchy of caste system but ignores merits of varna/ jati system. There is a small group of western writers who feel resilience of Indian social order has led to survival of Indian culture despite long foreign rule.

It is important to understand the importance of this varna/ jati system. Idea was to integrate the various diverse social groups into one ecosystem. To be a Hindu means to follow Dharma, not dharma shastra. Dharmashastra came very late. They assigned duties to each jati’s. Jati system was an open social order. There were intermarriages in varnas leading to multiplication of jati’s. Manu Smriti endorsed intermarriages. It also mentions people changing professions subject to need of hour. A kshatriya could work as potter subject to need. So nothing like birth based Varna. In nutshell during Vedic period there was Varna system which neither was birth based ,no hierarchy ,no communal hostility, no untouchability with no political grouping. Dharamshastras which came late added birth based varna, formalized jati’s. Dharamshastras were never dogmas for Hindu faith ,did not have status of Vedas and Upanishdas. Dharamshastras were tough on Brahmins. Manu smriti is blamed by some western writers for advocating untouchability.On contrary smriti disapproved of some vocations like butchery , hunting , calling them impure in the path of spiritual liberation . Restrictions with such type of vocations were more for hygiene , not for hatred. Untouchability started as a way to maintain ritual purity not way towards hatred towards particular community. There are lots of examples of marriages between brahmins and Shudras. Some Shudras performed vedic rites. Ved Vyas , Valmiki ,Vashita are classical examples of Shudra performing Brahminical roles.This debunks brahmins degraded Shudras.

Caste is not necessary factor to be a Hindu. There have Shudra kings, Shudra advisors to kings.Mahars were Shudra but became Kshatriya once they went to battle field. Shudra were economic backbone in Vedic economy. There were times when Shudra and Vaishya worked together in economic fields and were jointly called “Sudrayau”. There were many Shudras who became bhakti saints , example Saint Kabir. Manual scavenging was British creation. Modern Hinduism rejects caste system as told by Aurobindo ,Vivekananda, Sai baba etc.

It is interesting to note that Muslim kings were advised to employ who had aristocratic background. Sir Syed Ahmed khan , founder AMU banned admission to low caste Muslims. 75% Indian Muslims are called Dalit Muslims by Muslim world. Caste and untouchability are a reality for Muslims in South Asia. In Muslim period there was jati breakdown and abuse , hierarchy became stronger, caste became birth based, untouchability and endogamy came in. Even in Christianity between Catholics and protestants there are lot of divisions and subdivisions yet no one west discusses these issues in western society. Western model of society not only is divisive but is imposing too. With the arrival of Europeans Varna was turned into caste system. It was officially declared birth based , untouchability and endogamy are highlighted.

In post independence era this caste system has been turned into vote bank. Officially untouchability is declared illegal but on ground exploited to hilt to get votes and there is political grouping[communalism] too. Globally this caste system has been turned into critical caste, wokeism , linked to communal hostility. There is serious attempt in west to destroy Hindu culture because they feel it is an serious threat to Christian social culture. Western capitalism does not free society from structural biases. With their colonial mind set they destroy anything which comes in their way and want to establish new economic and social order which is human unfriendly.

In summary:- Vedic period--- Varna system , not birth based , no untouchability.

Dharamshastra --- Formalize jati’s, no untouchability ,hierarchy added .

Muslim rule----- Jati breakdown , abuse , birth based, endogamy and untouchability.

European period-----Birth based , untouchability , rigid hierarchy, communal hostility.

Post independence----untouchability illegal, vote bank , political grouping.


Bhagwat Gita---Varna system is not birth based says Lord Krishna. It was created on the basis of individual character and occupation. They were created on the basis of gunas and karma. Krishna life encompasses all varnas—” Raised by Vaishya[cowherd], ruled Dwarka [kshatriya] ,becomes charioteer [Shudra] , taught Gita [Brahmin]”. That should silence critics of Varna/ caste system of Hindu society. It is the resilience and accommodation of this Hindu society that has allowed it to survive despite very serious attempts by adversaries to defame it.

JAI SHRI RAM

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

     

                         Working women woes

It has been observed that modern working women is at crossroads vis a vis her career and family.

1.Not interested in childbearing and childcaring as s sole person responsible for the child. It affects their career and ambitions.

2.One in three women have sexual dysfunction or sexual boredom.

3.Unreciprocated love by partner replaced by interests.

4. Happily married just 17—20%.

5. Living together but not loving each other.

6. Prefer to live in virtual world, more interested in social media.

7. Marrying ---Not keen, 40-50% want to remain unmarried to live free  life.

Another study shows following stats:-

1.Around 20% had not married by age of 30 years.

2.1 in 3 women had no children.

3.Happiness levels falling every day.

4. Working women thought work and children cause her lot of stress.

5.Working women complain their partners dismissed their pleasure.

6. Burnt out--- There is rise in frustration and mental exhaustion.

7. Significant working women suffer from insomnia.

Working women psychology: --

Working women are a role model for those who understand there is lot behind their smile such as hard work , society pressure , family pressure , tired body and spirit of not giving up. Women find themselves forced into public sphere to find importance and self-full[MB1]  filment as their role in home has drastically reduced. Women are forced out of home due to male aggression, low motivation, lack of respect and advanced technologies. Women today have many psychological problems. They feel tremendous difficulty in rearing child in unsuitable environments. Modern women do not feel childbearing as an honor unlike past times. Feminism claims of social and political equality but, it instead targets sexual and social frustrations of women. Wives holding higher posts face marital problems. Women who seek successful career and family life find it difficult to achieve both. Women leaving home lose their sense of emotional security and their ownership of femininity. When she does not desire child, she will not enjoy sex. Instead, she faces mental breakdown-Neurosis. More educated experience less sexual pleasure as their priorities are different. Women with extramarital relationships face excessive psychological instability. It has been seen percentage of burnt-out women is rapidly increasing. This means she has lot of mental stress[ Neurosis] , frustration and confusion. She realizes Ramp walks are exploitation of women by men but is not ready to condemn it, instead she feels such shows give her” confidence and her value outside”. This is bizarre thinking. A woman looking for man to validate her existence in real sense is a weak woman. Because of her mental stress she resorts to drugs, drinking and smoking. None of these are virtues. There is rise in “Date raping”. For  reader, Date raping means, “Woman ‘s drink is spiked in party and her so called friend molests her”. Consumption of these things will make her weak and vulnerable. They harm her body, yet she sticks to these to get away from stressful life. One needs to face a problem than shying away from it. Shying away cannot solve problem, she needs to understand that.

Working women and marriage: --

 Working women as on today feels marriage is a liability. Arranged marriages were condemned on the ground that boy and girl were bonded without they knowing each other. That gave birth to Love marriage, where in boy/girl court together to know each other before getting married. Whole idea being to make marriage, a success. But in real life love marriages are also failing. Incidence of failure is around 40—45% in West. It is much higher in some European countries. Why are love marriages failing? Answer is that marriage does not carry same meaning today than what it carried in past. For a successful marriage, flexibility, understanding each other and trust are prerequisites. A successful marriage means—commitment, accepting responsibility and knowing partners plus and negatives. This working woman feels marriage limits her freedom, gives her extra burden. She also feels she is taken for granted in family. These conditions/limitations are not acceptable to her. Marriage has three components—Pleasure, Children, and lifelong company. Children bearing, she is not interested as it affects her career. Lifelong company with one person is boring and taxing. She is glued to social media. In social media she chit chats with persons whom she may even not know. The reason is that she is not burdened to behave in a certain way, she’s not judged for her opinions and she’s free to express herself freely. She prefers social media chat over a person who may be sitting just across table [Partner] . That is set of mind of present-day woman. For Pleasure she chooses new options available. One option is “Live in relationship”. In this option she lives with a person without any commitment. One can walk out of this relationship at any time without any hassles. Problem with this option is—“Insecurity”. There are social pressures also against this relationship, but she is ready to fend herself against these pressures. Second option is to remain alone, no relationships. She satisfies her desire by using artificial tools [ Sex toys]. Her thinking affected by material available on this subject on internet, Utube etc. Little does she realize that these outlets are commercial. Information given is deceptive. How many of them know long term side effects of these artificial means?  Percentage of Loners is rising day by day. In Japan it has reached to 40-45% of young population. In India a study showed 24-40%did not want to marry. Reasons given were that marriage curtails freedom, affects career, and gives added responsibility. Third option is to have a boyfriend with whom she has physical relationship but both live separately. This sounds good so long as it is one only. There are women who go extra mile I,e Sexual encounters , wife swapping. This sexual behavior amounts to closed door prostitution.  This not only is unethical but immoral too. That is the state of affairs as on today visavis working woman and marriage.

Conclusion:--

 From the afore said it seems institution of marriage is dying out. Need of hour is to rethink about this whole issue keeping in view aspirations of working woman. In past dowry and abuse were two chief causes of failed marriages. Now marriages fail as true love has been replaced by interests, career and not ready to accept responsibilities. In some small group sexual dissatisfaction is also cause of marriage failure. Institution of marriage needs to be respected and reinstated in society. It is important for a woman to reclaim household domesticity with authority. This reclaim can also help in restoring social order. She can continue her career ambitions but at the same time she has to be part of family. It seems true love in modern times is replaced by lust and interests. True love needs to come back. It will need some sacrifice. Men need to shun authoritarian attitude, help her in household, support and encourage her career. Successful marriages have high levels of friendship and emotional connect. It is important to turn towards rather turn away to make marriage a success. It seems in present times boy and girl are together for vested interests, not for love. True love needs to come back and should be bipartisan. Only in real love individuals can be happy. Once individual is happy, consequently society will   become happy. True love really improves each other’s lives.

---“Money only impresses lazy girls. A man with money is bonus, not a ladder to upgrade”.

-----"A beautiful woman with a brain is a lethal combination”.

 


 [MB1]

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

                                                       Historical Ancient India

 

Ancient Indian history is mystic, not mythical as projected by Western media. There has always been attempt to explain existence. There has been belief too of existence of realities beyond intellect. Vedas are records of ancient spiritual teaching of humanity. History of India was written during colonial era which begins with Indus civilization. This is erroneous as it ignores preindus history documented in Puranas and Vedas.

     Why hasn’t mythology been used as a narrative to form ancient Indian history? Reading Vedas, Puranas gives us deep insight how Indians lived in last 20000 years. Even worn-out structures tell us lot about past. Those who write history should always be aware of bias/prejudice in themselves and in other writers. A history written with particular set of mind is no history. There are writers like El Mansouri , Sir William jones , Paul Roberts , Adolf Eramn who say migrants from India crossed Suez and settled on banks of Nile. Egyptian records tell us they originally come from South, from a land called, PUNT, an Asian country. PUNT  is believed to be Malabar coast of Deccan.

 Facts unearthed by marine archeological explorations showed that a city existed which is 9500 years old , older than Sumerian civilization. In 2001 scientists discovered two ancient cities at gulf of Khambhat. Carbon dating showed it 9500-year-old. It means civilization lost at the end of ice age. It means we could be dealing with a civilization much older to flood myth of Christianity. Vedic civilization was started by survivors of previous civilization. At least some parts of Vedas must have been composed earlier than 6000 years. Sangam literature tells us submerging of East coast, 11000 years back. This is the time when sea levels rose. How long would it have taken a civilization that was there 9500 years ago to build cities of that scale? Around 12000 ago there was a cultured existence around coastal margins of India. What was before 12000 years[ice age] is not known? Valmiki mentioned in Taittriya Brahmana [4600BC], so Ramayana must be earlier. Dr PV Vartak , historian relying on planetary positions in Ramayana gives date of birth of Lord Rama Dec , 7323BC. According to him Ramayana dates 9300 ago. Dr Chaubey, genetic scientist says KOL tribe today are descendants of King Guha who was a Nishada king who befriended Lord Rama.

   It is Panini who coined word “Bharata” for the region. Indian subcontinent had six countries—India, Pakistan , Bangala Desh ,Afghanistan , Nepal and Bhutan. Whole area was called Bharat Varsham. Hindu kush connected India with central Asia and Persia. Archeological explorations done in 20th century attest to Indosarsvat civilization extending to present day Afghanistan. Hindu kush was once a Buddhist area [ Bamiyan Buddhas]. Some believe Kush word is from Lord Rama’s son , Kush who ruled this area. Hindu kush acted as barrier between India and central Asia. Mahabharata epic gives us details of geography of India. Mahabharata is historical is proved by astronomical references of Bhagvat Puran. The position of Nava Graha mentioned in Bhagvat Puran is fully validated by science. It gives us timeline of war. Geographical details in Ramayana and Mahabharata could only be acquired by actual travelling. Writer Louis Jaccolliot says, “ Egypt received from India , its social institutions and laws”. Such was antiquity of Indian civilization, yet being ignored by Western writers because of their mind set.

 Marine explorations, archeological excavations, Satellite images, Carbon dating , artifacts found and planetary archeology have dated some events as follows:--

1.Bhirrana---oldest metropolis, 10000years.

2 Dwarka---8000---9500 years.

3.Rakhigarh , Garhi—A village in Hissar. It is site of pre indus civilization settlement, 6500BC.

4. Lothal , Gujarat—3700BC. It had world’s earliest dock.

5 Mehargarh-----7000BC.

6. Ramayana----12000BC ,  Mahabharata 5561BC,Rigveda 6000BC --- by Nilesh oak.

  Now it is established Ram Setu  existed  and it is man-made. In August 1995 , 43 historians and archeologists fixed Mahabharata war between 3139BC---3138BC.Bhatnagar puts RAMA – Ravana war In 5076BC. Frawley puts early VEDIC---- Harappa between 6500BC-----3100BC.

 Word Arya means people living by ideals as postulated by Vedas. It does not refer to any race or language Imaginary Aryan invasion of India in 1500BC is biggest bluff spread by western writers to negate Vedic civilization which preceded all other civilizations on this earth. This Aryan invasion of India now stands fully refuted.  India has been cradle of human civilization. Vedic culture gave birth to a religion called Sanatan Dharma[ Hinduism]. Hinduism unlike other religions does not demand blind faith but pursuit of TRUTH by dharmic means. This religion evolved over a period. This Vedic civilization spread from India to Europe via Iran before Mesopotamia and Egyptian civilizations. It also spread to Far East [ Combodia , Thailand , Indonesia , Malaysia]. Bias of western writers towards this civilization needs to be removed. Misinterpretation of Vedas by Christian scholars needs to be corrected. Historical material in Puranas and Vedas needs to be analyzed and not ignored. Ancient dynasties who ruled ancient India need to be given due place in history. Science and Math  originated in India and went to west via Iran. Two great epics have played significant role in nation integration.

      Indian culture and religion[ Hinduism , Buddhism] spread through out South East Asia. This country has produced two great civilizations--"Vedic civilization and Indo Sarswat civilzation[ IVC], India is united by its ancient culture and heritage. Vedas contain timeless wisdom. It totally ignores preceding Vedic civilization. West totally ignores what is written in Vedas [Rig] and Puranas which give us chronology of ancient rulers of India. Recent research in archeology ,archeoastronomy , marine exploration , Satellite imagery and literary evidence suggest that India has a history which goes back to 7000BC-8000BC.Vedas and Puranas recorded history just in the form that is different than what is considered norm today.

         Toba volcano of Sumatara, Indonesia 7500 years back put a ash layer of 15cm over whole India. We have  archeological evidence of Jwalapuram in Karnool district showing human habitation before and after Toba eruption. Around 11200 years back incessant rains followed by earthquake caused massive floods. This occurred  during the reign of Vaivasvata Manu. Due to earthquake Sarswati river changed its course and it started flowing westwards from Kurukhetra , Sirsa to Kalibangan. Sutlej ,Yamuna and Drisadvati were main contributaries to Sarswati river. Sea level rose by 28 metres in 500 years , about 9500--10000 years ago. This rise in sea level submerged Dwarka..

    It is traditionally recorded that Lord Rama was born in last century of Treta yuga. Vedveer Arya's research reestablishes the chronology of ancient India using Surya Siddhanta and Krita Yugant in 6778BC as the sheet anchor.Saptrishi cycle of 2700 years was introduced in 6778BC. Thus one could fix period of Treta Yuga around 6777BC---5577BCand Dwarpa Yuga around 5577BC--3177BC. By astronomical  observation which is verifiable, date of birth of Lord Rama could be in 5674BC. Mahabharata period around 3162BC.Aihole inscription establishes Mahabharata war in 3162BC.Western  scholars blindly assume 1AD as Christ birthday with out any proof . This means Christian era does not deserve to be sheet anchor of world history. Indian mythology needs to be used as an narrative to form sequential type of ancient Indian history. Valmiki was first historian who authored Ramayana , just like Herodotus was for Greece.Not all historians have been witness to events. They depended on the records available.

      Vedic calendars give perfect information of eclipses with perfect time. This is verifiable even now. Why is this valuable piece of evidence ignored by western writers?Max Muller observed that mythology of Egyptians[also of Greeks] is wholly founded on Vedic traditions.Harrapa civilization dwarfed Egyptian and Mesopotamia in sheer size.[2mil sq miles]. Saraswati civilization did not give us Pyramids or sphinx but gave world mystic philosophy in the form of Vedas and Upanishads.The key characteristic of this Vedic civilization has been that it continued in a unbroken tradition from ancient times to present era.There are many writers now like Bohlen, Brugsch , Ludwig Heeren who attest that Indians brought civilization into Egypt. 

Louis Jaccolliot says,"Egypt received from India , by Manes or Manu , its social institutions and laws.........".

  At the heart of Egyptian life was communication with gods After life concept was imported from India. Egyptians preserved bodies of Pharaoh's in tombs , with treasures for the after life.

    A new book on Indian history is need of hour. It is certain now that Indian history does not start with battle of Panipat[1526AD].Hymns of Rigveda have abundant material", for political history in the shape of names of kings , kingdoms and tribes who ruled ancient India".River Saraswati sustained a civilization spread over 2 Mil sq miles. This river vanished around 1900BC but is mentioned in Rigveda 30 times. This river is not a myth but a empirical fact proved now by satellite imagery. IndoSarswat civilization occupied the same geographical area as is described in Rigveda.

. It is really saddening to note that Indian universities still have western history books and western translations of Vedas and Upanishads. Acceptance of this  western interpretation of Vedas amounts to self-betrayal. Tolerance should not mean acceptance of falsehood. Indian intellectuals need to rise,. correct the wrong doings of western writers and put Indian ancient history at proper pedestal.India is  paying price for its misuse of philosophies. Varna system has been converted into caste system by greedy brahmins and religion turned into theoretical concept. Hinduism in west is reflected through lens of Abrahamic religions thus theological uniqueness of Hinduism is being totally compromised. India is a mix of  spirituality and materialism , a  point missed by west. Rigveda not only is history books but book speaking of human mind while Puranas give us traditional history.

  Need of hour is to rewrite ancient Indian history and recognize it. Aryan invasion theory needs to be debunked. Indian writers need to rely on manuscripts in Sanskrit and not rely on English translations of Vedas and Upanishads.

 Humbolt……..” Bhagvat Gita is perhaps the loftiest and the deepest thing that world has to show”.

   

 

 

 



Friday, August 14, 2020

Secularism/ Selectivism

 

Secularism/Selectivism

 

Indian constitution in its preamble nowhere talks of secularism. By definition word means state has no religion and is equidistant from all religions. But in Indian context secularism did not mean to be away from religion. Hence word secularism was not deliberately put by Nehru in preamble to suite his political interests. It was not to be there, otherwise how could Indian courts recognize Sharia based laws? How could GOI take over management of Hindu shrines but spare take over management of Muslim shrines /Church? How could Centre/ states finance Madrassas, pay for maintenance of Jamia Masjid , Delhi? How could state give caste based reservation, minority benefits to Muslim majority zones.? See 2% Lakshadweep Hindus are majority and 97%Muslims are called minority. Nagaland 90% Christians are called minority but 8% Hindus are majority. In Mizoram 3% Hindus are considered majority. Hindus are minority in 8 states but fruits of minority are reaped by Muslims and Christians in these states.  This is the type of secularism Nehru and his dynasty adopted in our country.

                  India did not practice true secularism but a selective version of it,  which I call Selectvism. Word secularism and socialism were added in constitution by Indra Gandhi in 1975 to consolidate Muslim votes. Nehru passed four Hindu code bills but did not touch Muslim personal law. Article 30 , 29 of constitution just provided protection to minorities but Nehru and co manipulated these articles to let Muslims propagate their religion  and also run their religious institutions. Hindus were forbidden to propagate their religion and run their institutions. Even management of Hindu shrines was taken over by Govt. This is the type of secularism we are having in this country.  Nehru gave Iftyar parties every year to please Muslims but refused to join celebrations of SOM Nath Temple as he felt his secularism will be hurt. Even asking for vote from Imam is secular but appealing for vote from Hindu is communal in our country now a days .Even judiciary is now and then interfering in Hindu beliefs but does not entertain any such complaints about other religions. See the case of Babri masjid. Courts were debating it as land dispute. Courts put Hindu Astha on sidelines. When Muslims acknowledge that masjid is just a prayer place and can be relocated, why did not they offer to relocate masjid? Muslims even tell us construction of Masjid at Temple site is unislamic. Where did this principle go in Babri case? Whole exercise by courts / Muslims was to tell us that they damn care about our Astha. I want to ask courts/Muslims, did Babur pay to management of Ram temple before demolition to make it land title case for Muslims of today?  Babri dispute case was a hoax played by Muslims and congress party to degrade Hindu faith and beliefs. This is classical example of Nehruian secularism.  This type of secularism is supported by our leftist press as they want India to break again.

    Hindu society as on today seems to be in frozen grief even in independent India. This grief started with arrival of Muslims in India and is continuing till now. For Hindus in India building of temple at AYODHYA means injustice of centuries has come to end.  Truth needs to be told which means acknowledging past. This has not been allowed in India till today. India’s secularism stands due to Hindu Ethos. We are now tired of proving regularly that we are secular. It is Muslims who have to prove their loyalty to nation and constitution. Muslims telling “Hindus” are intolerant and fanatic is joke of millennia. If you want true secularism in India you have got to preserve Hindu Ethos first. Our constitution needs some amendments, secularism needs to be redefined. True secularism means no favors to any religion. If I am not questioning your faith, you have no business to question my faith? Whether my faith is Mythological or historical is none of your business. Hindus need to assert their view point and faith. Our constitution says faith cannot be questioned. Why then our intellectuals, Judiciary, religious peers probing our faith?We Hindus are deprived of many constitutional  rights. We need to fight for our rights and force Govt not to interfere in our religious practice. Hindus need to come out of stigma of oppressed people. We need to take pride in our faith and values which we have inherited. We seem to have become second class citizens in our own country.  It is a matter of concern , need to come out of slumber.


Tuesday, July 28, 2020

india----Democracy# mockcracy


                                               India-----Democracy#  mockcracy
Countries around globe are valued according to their economic strength, military power and values they cherish. China perceives India weak both militarily and economically. It also sees India politically not cohesive and inheriting a weak judicial system. Keeping this in mind they mounted attack in LADAKH despite facing economic meltdown. Whole idea was to brow beat India physically and psychologically. Within India we see opposition who have utter hatred for Modi practicing untouchability and encouraging divisive forces. When a Hindu talks about nation or Hinduism he is immediately labelled Fascist. When a muslim talks about his religion and loyalty to Ummah and not nation , he is labelled as True Muslim by our leftist media. Secularism in India means ---“Bashing of Hindus and its culture”. Following points will highlight this divisive and hateful approach towards Hindus and country.
1.       In Calicut University “Come September”, a lecture delivered by Arundati ROY in 2002 is being included in syllabus of BA course. In this book author talks about liberation of Kashmir . The article is critical of Indian army, talks about oppression of Kashmiri muslim, support to people like Guru and separatist elements. Even anti terror measures by GOI are criticized. Not a word in whole lecture about ethnic cleansing of valley.Our free press is mum.
2.       .Boomi Pujan at AYODHYA is being opposed. Leftist and Congress call it damaging to secular fabric of India. Even telecast of event by DD is being opposed on same pretext—“--damage to secularism”. One wants to ask why was n’t secularism hit when DD telecast centenary ceremony of Deoband , inaugurated by Indra Gandhi ? DD telecast of POPE VISIT IN 1999 ,2002 HAJ ,2014 Bodi sattva festival , canonization of TERESA in2016 , Kartarpur corridor opening in 2018 are other examples of DD live telecast of religious events. This clearly shows LEFT and congress have utter disregard for Hindu Astha.
3.       CCA and NRC controversy--. It is parliamentary committee headed by Pranab Mukerjee which recommended its implementation when UPA govt was in power. Kapil Sibal was this committee’s one of the members. Yet same Kapil opposed NRC , CCA in Raja Sabha when NDA in
      power.  Delhi riots were organized to oppose CCA. Whole idea to polarize country against Modi.
4.       There is a open support to separatist elements in JNU , AMU , MALDA,Jamia all in name of freedom of speech. Nowhere constitution tells that antinational activists should have free ride. In this our media also supports these elements for personal reasons. When a Imam calls muslims to block road in Assam to cut off NEast from India , no media or politician dears to challenge this Imam. When Shaheen bagh blockade continued despite SC order to shift venue ,no one talked about contempt of court? NO one among party or media explained to masses that CCA gives citizenship , does not take away. Idea was to malign the govt and create wedge between ruling party and MUSLIMS.
5.       .Even after 70 years of independence country does not know who belongs to majority and who is a minority. Our constitution is also vague on this.Net result muslims and Christians where in majority in number enjoy fruits of minority. Kashmiri pundit , a minority in valley has never been given benefit of minority. It is Kashmiri muslim constituting 99% of population who reaps fruits of minority in JK . What could be more bizarre than this interpretation of law?  Ironically no one in press talks about this anomaly.
6.        OUR Judiciary believes in activisim. It believes in ABRAHIMIC morality and Macaulyean rules. It is ready to interfere in Hindu religious matters but does not entertain any complaint about other religions. It has least respect for traditional and local values.
7.       All nonhindus can propagate their religion and even their institutions but not Hindus. Hindu shrines are under govt control but not muslim shrines nor Christian churches and their assets. All hurdles are put in when a temple is to be built but no hurdles for mosque or church.
8.       . We still teach wrong and distorted history to our children . We eulogize invaders/ marauders in our text books. Proudly say who built Taj , Qutab minar but erase lines in history where it is written who destroyed Som nath Temple and Ram temple at Ayodhya etc. Over 4000 temples were destroyed by Moghuls in their rule but we only talk about Babri masjid demolition. Babri had seized to be mosque long back as no one prayed there. It was just a structure,  yet we made a big issue out of it for 70 years. Aryan invasion is still taught  when no such invasion occurred. It is a British legacy which we still carry forward in independent India.
Congress man Digvijya called Zakir Naik –a peace lover, even inaugurated a book which blamed RSS for Mumbai blasts . No one in press or congress questioned Digvijya. Reason, to remain in good books of muslims.
9.       NEXUS between Bollywood, ISI and Pakistan has been exposed and our politicians are busy to defend them. This trio is financing terrorist organizations, unrest in JNU and funding other divisive forces to destabilize country.
Conclusion:--
       There is a systematic attempt being made to destabilize India. Constitution does not offer incentives to minorities but just protection of their rights, yet day in and out we are offering concession after concession to minorities [muslims]. This appeasement is going to harm country in long run. If India has to survive it has to be cohesive, economically and militarily strong! All divisive forces irrespective of their religion need to be booked and punished. Constitution needs some amendments and judiciary some reforms. Secularism needs to be redefined—“I love you , you don’t love me is not secularism but authoritarianism.” We have collectively to act to save India. India is bound to break if we don’t act against divisive forces now. Freedom of speech does not mean you get away with anything you say ,be it antinational. We tolerate too much of nonsense in the name of democracy. GOVT of day has to act and not hide behind the curtain of judiciary.

  Great Irony:-
    
                   Moghuls came from outside , ruled and became Indians. Indians [Hindus] became Kafir’s and Indian [ muslim] refuses to call himself Indian. He says he is descendent of Ghazni and Babur.”
                                             

Thursday, April 2, 2020

India Bashing


                                    Why  India Bashing  ?   

      
We see western media reporting regularly,
        “Rise of extremist Hinduism in India under Modi rule”.
Then we see reports from Muslim world talking of Muslim genocide in India. This is despite the fact that Indian Muslim enjoys full benefits of democracy and freedom of religion. A reasonable query arises why West and Muslim world against India? India not only has been cradle of human civilization but has contributed a lot in science and Math to world. India’s contribution to world in unparalleled, yet finds itself in foot notes of human history. Why is India’s contribution ignored? One needs to go deeper on this:--
Western world:--
            Western world proclaims that all that which is in this world is due to them. Not only they take credit for development in this world but want to get royalty for same. This is despite the fact that origin of science and math is from India. They suppress all evidence which points to origin of science from India. When Britishers came to India they invented Aryan invasion theory [1500BC]. This was to discredit Indian [VEDIC] civilization. They demonized Sanskrit, even banned Sanskrit reading. Ancient Indian history and cultural heritage was declared Myth. They ingrained in our minds that Aryans came to India from central Asia and established a civilized India. This Aryan invasion theory stands now debunked. It is proved now that Aryans were Indian people and were founders of two great civilizations---Vedic civilization and Indus valley civilization. When Britishers left in 1947 they divided country into two. They also left behind handful of British trained beauracrates whose job was to carry British legacy and British laws. These British cronies continued to ridicule Indian customs and traditions. They also created a class of people with leftist tendencies. Divide and rule policy of British was continued by these leftist intellectuals. Net result of this was that instead of uniting India they were involved in further division of India. Wearing of saree is viewed by west as selling Hindu ideology. Various organizations in west supporting vegetarianism and Veganism are projected as compassionate and animal lovers but when a Hindu talks of vegetarian diet he is labelled by western press as “Hindu Nationalist”. Such is prejudice of west towards India.  In their efforts to down play India they are now helped by various political groups especially congress. These political groups want to rule country by using religion, poverty and caste as tools to achieve their objectives. These politicians in order to lure people have appeasement policy in the form reservation, allowing Madrassas to teach extremist Islam , offering citizenship to illegal immigrants , Free ratio etc.  They do it to get votes and to remain in power. Most of the appeasement policies of these political parties are against the spirit of constitution. This vote bank policy is costing nation its integrity and unity.
Muslims of India:--
It is a irony Indian Muslim instead of owning country is talking of his DNA matching with invaders like Timur , Ghazni etc. He is being taught in Madrassas that he cannot be ruled by nonmuslim. It is important to understand mind set of Indian muslim. Reader is advised to read book of Dr BR Ambedkar—“Pakistan or partition of India” on this issue. Below are some excerpts of this book:--
      Muslims of India do not call India as their motherland.
         Muslim has loyalty to Ummah[Islamic brotherhood] and does not believe in universal brotherhood.
        Muslim should be loyal to religion, not to nation they live.
         Muslims are against social reforms, feel their social order is perfect
         Muslims believe that they are truthful and intellectuals. This is despite the fact that their contribution in Science is nearly zero.
       Muslim should not be interested in politics but religion alone. In order to achieve their goals they can go to any extent.              
         These Muslims made various irrational demand in 1939.Some of them were:--
     50% reservation in legislature despite their low population.
    No bandbajja in front of mosque.
       Allow Cow slaughter.”
      Ambedkar even highlighted social evils in Muslim social order like child  marriage,Intolerance,Fanatical adherence to faith , position of women in Islam and Polygamy.
  Ultimately  demands of Muslims ended in partition of India, their cherished goal. Secularism and democracy are not their cup of tea. Instead these things are antithesis of Muslim goals. They have no respect for Hindu, call him “Kafir” ,a derogatory word. They know little about other religions, yet call their religion Supreme, even ultimate. They do not carry much respect for other religions, yet demand respect for their religion. Religion and Ideology go hand in hand in Islam. They are ready to take pass ports of western countries, even marry their daughters and then label western countries “Evil countries”. This is the height of hypocrisy they indulge in to suite their interests. Muslims refuse to join mainstream of country they live and yet demand rights in name of religion. Now and then they raise demands in name of religion:--
1.       They oppose uniform civil code in India but have accepted it in West, Australia.
2.       They project Burqa as one of the basic tenants of Islam in India. Same Burqa in Saudi Arabia where sharia laws are in force is prohibited in Mecca. If burqa were basic tenant, would Saudia dare to prohibit it in Mecca? A case of double standards.
3.       There is no mention of beef and COW in Al Quran, yet in India they are making cow slaughter a issue, ignoring sentiments of majority .
4.       Mosque relocations are done in Islamic world without any fuss. In India they tried to make a case that Mosque is basic tenant of Islam. When mosque is not regarded a basic tenant in Muslim world why make a case here?  Pure misleading tactics.
Recent events in country particularly New Delhi are an eye opener for all of us. They agitated, indulged in riots under the garb of CAA protest. In this they were equally helped by Congress party and our Lutyen press. They misled masses by telling them that by CAA implementation they will lose citizenship.  A pure lie. CAA offers citizenship and does not deprive any one of his citizenship.
With this set of mind of Muslims of India one has seriously to ponder on this issue for better future of nation.Muslim politics is clerical. None of the secular categories of life have any role in Islam.
Conclusion:--
Whole Muslim world is ganging up against India, supporting Indian Muslims in name of Ummah. West has its own selfish reasons to undermine India. No one even in western world talks of Ottoman empires brutalities around globe, Timur families’ barbarism in India but they talk of Intolerance and genocide of Muslims in India. In reality Indian Muslim enjoys full benefits of democracy which none of muslim countries has. Whole muslim world including West protested against CAA despite it being internal matter of country. Every country has its own laws including immigration. CAA was projected as antimuslim and protests were organized. This was done to undermine and defame Modi govt. West is still obsessed with Aryan invasion theory and ignores ancient Indian civilization. They want to tell world that they are founders of human civilization. We need to have policy to correct mind set of both Muslim world and Western world. We need to emphasize to Muslims to own country they live in and abide by state law [constitution]. Muslims of India need to acknowledge that they are Hindu converts and not descendants of Timur. Misconceptions about Hinduism and ancient India need to be cleared. These misconceptions were created by West as it suited them both politically and religiously. Muslims are far safer in India than in any part of world. Appeasement policies towards minorities need to be scrapped. Appeasement may get some votes but at the cost of nation’s unity. We drum beat unity in diversity slogan in India but do very little to strengthen unity of country. We Indians need to take pride in our past and heritage. So long as we don’t take pride in our customs and traditions we will be losers. We need to explain to whole world about India’s contribution in shaping this world.
  “India stands for peace, no superior or inferior even in religion, human brotherhood, not religious brotherhood and freedom.”
“Ideology of global conquest by Western world/ Islamic world can never be truly people and pluralism friendly.”
  
      
  

Sunday, March 1, 2020

INDIA and MUSLIMS


                                                          India  and Muslims

                           Muslim canon law--------Dar-ul-Islam [Abode of Islam]
                                                                        Dar-Ul-Harb [abode of war]

By this doctrine India can belong to Muslims only when they rule it. India ceases to be land of Muslims when not rulers.
     Then a pertinent question comes----Is this doctrine compatible with Indian democracy and Secularism we preach?
                      Answer  is -----NO.
With this political set of mind of Muslims, how should we handle Secularism and democracy? One needs to read book of B R Ambedkar---“Pakistan or partition of India” on this issue. Muslims have already divided this country in to three and a section of them want further division of this country. Take statement of Imam, asking Muslims to block road in ASSAM to cut North East from INDIA. Analyze statements of Muslim leaders like Waris , OWAISI AND OTHERS WHO OPENLY challenge GOI.  A agitation has been started in country on nonexistent NRC. There is willful twisting of CAA , NPR and Muslims are told to agitate against union of India for its antimuslim law. People are told CAA will deprive them of citizenship which is a fabricated Lie. CAA grants citizenship, does not take away citizenship. Whole idea of agitation is to polarize and divide India again. There are Muslim leaders who say we are descendants of Timur , Babar , Ghazni . By this they are telling masses that we were rulers and we should rule again.  In this effort they are helped by clergy too. Darul-uloom-Deoband has called Modi anti muslim and has told Muslims in India to oppose GOI  tooth and nail.
                     Behavior of Muslims in India has been irrational in past and continues till now. Instead of voluntarily surrendering land for RAM temple at AYODHYA  they made a issue out of it.  Relocation of mosque should have been no issue as mosque is not basic tenant of Islam. Ayodhya temple is one of the pillars of Hinduism, and Muslims ignored Hindu sentiments on this. They want us to be sensitive on religious issues but themselves are not sensitive on other religions beliefs. So many mosques have been built over temple sites and Muslims are proud of this heritage. Muslims make issue of Beef in India. There is no mention of beef in AL Quran. Beef is one of the tenants of Hinduism, yet they ignore it.  This is pure arrogance and Dadagiri.This is happening because we Hindus are too tolerant. No Muslim scholar/ politician is admonishing them for their behavior. There is a big Irony,  some  muslim intellectuals are telling that Hindus are becoming intolerant. Just because you dislike BJP , you have no right to destroy country. This behavior is not acceptable.
                         The amount of freedom Indian Muslim enjoys is unparalled in whole world. They don’t have that much freedom even in Muslim countries. Yet they talk about human right violation. Their leaders are dead silent on ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri pundits in valley but talk of internet facilities in valley. They are dead silent on how minorities are treated in Pakistan and Bangla Desh but talk on settling Rohingya in India. How would you label this mentality of Muslims of India?
   Pakistan founder Jinnah said, “Aurangzeb presided over a conquest state where Hindus had to submit to his rule unwillingly”. Muslims of India do not acknowledge it  as they don’t want to be projected as bad people in country.
While in Islam   religion and politics are inseparable, in India we have separated two for better governance. Aurangzeb in 1669AD issued order to destroy all temples in India which included Kashivishvanath temple in Varanasi , Somnath temple in Gujarat. Tons of literature including Holy Scriptures were burnt. Yet Muslims call him devote and pious Muslim. Mohd Bin Qasim decapitated all Brahmins above the age of 17 years. Ghazni looted and destroyed Somnath temple. Mass killings by Timur, Babar ,Aurangzeb  , even Akbar are documented by Muslim historians of the day . Yet Muslims in India tell us Islam believes in brotherhood and respect for other religions.
   As a society we should be ashamed to blindly believe that Sufi’s were proponents of humanity and tolerance. Infact many Sufi’s presided over demolition of temples and built mosques at temple site. Some of the Sufi edicts were as follows:--
       Hindus should bow physically to muslim.
        Hindu to dress deplorably, have distinct dress.
        Hindu cannot ride horse and use jewelry.
        Hindu cannot wear turban.”

THOUSAND OF HINDUS VISIT MUSLIM SHRINES LITTLE KNOWING THAT THESE HOLY MEN WORKED IN TANDEM  with Muslim rulers to impose Islam in India. India gave refuge to Prophet’s family who were fleeing their country, chief among them was Caliph  Ali ‘s daughter Ruqaya. They were given shelter by Lahore king Raja Anandpal. Ironically no Muslim shielded Anandpal when Muslim invaders raided India. This is height of ingratitude. Arrogance of Muslims  has not ended even after partitioning India.
     With above brief historical review and mind set of Indian Muslim, it is hard to believe they believe in peace. For them India is Dar-ul-Harb [Abode of war]. Instead of being grateful for freedom they enjoy in this country they are bent upon to split it further. Muslims of India owe a apology to Hindus for all what they have done to us and country.
     Dadagiri of Muslim clergy needs to be stopped. Madrassas need to teach history of ancient India and fundamentalism in their teachings needs to be stopped. Muslims of India need to own this country and help in building and strengthening democracy and secularism. Muslims need to change Muslim canon law. They should talk in terms of democracy and respect for other religions.
  Lastly, Muslims of India should accept that they are Hindu converts. If they continue to harp on foreign origin then we have every right to treat them as invaders. Muslims of India have to decide—“”-Indian  natives or foreigner”.